Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Clin Infect Dis ; 2022 Oct 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2252041

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adults previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 develop short-term immunity and may have increased reactogenicity to COVID-19 vaccines. This prospective, multi-center active surveillance cohort study examined the short-term safety of COVID-19 vaccines in adults with a prior history of SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Canadian adults vaccinated between December 22, 2020 and November 27, 2021 were sent an electronic questionnaire 7 days post dose 1, dose 2 and dose 3 vaccination. The main outcome was health events occurring in the first 7 days after each vaccination that prevented daily activities, resulted in work absenteeism or required a medical consultation, including hospitalization. RESULTS: Among 684,998 vaccinated individuals, 2.6% (18,127/684,998) reported a prior history of SARS-CoV-2 infection a median of 4 months (interquartile range 2-6 months) previously. After dose 1, individuals with moderate (bedridden) to severe (hospitalized) COVID-19 who received BNT162b2, mRNA1273 or ChAdox1-S vaccines had higher odds of a health event preventing daily activities, resulting in work absenteeism or requiring medical consultation; adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 3.96 (95% CI 3.67-4.28) for BNT162b2, 5.01 (4.57-5.50) for mRNA1273 and 1.84 (1.54-2.20) for ChAdox1-S compared to no infection. Following dose 2 and 3, the greater risk associated with previous infection was also present but attenuated compared to dose 1. For all doses, the association was lower or absent after mild or asymptomatic infection. CONCLUSION: Adults with moderate or severe previous SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to have a health event sufficient to impact routine activities or require medical assessment in the week following each vaccine doses.

2.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 22(11): 1553-1564, 2022 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1984273

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pregnant individuals have been receiving COVID-19 vaccines following pre-authorisation clinical trials in non-pregnant people. This study aimed to determine the frequency and nature of significant health events among pregnant females after COVID-19 vaccination, compared with unvaccinated pregnant controls and vaccinated non-pregnant individuals. METHODS: We did an observational cohort study, set in seven Canadian provinces and territories including Ontario, Quebec, British Columbia, Alberta, Nova Scotia, Yukon, and Prince Edward Island. Eligibility criteria for vaccinated individuals were a first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine within the previous 7 days; an active email address and telephone number; ability to communicate in English or French; and residence in the aforementioned provinces or territories. Study participants were pregnant and non-pregnant females aged 15-49 years. Individuals were able to participate as controls if they were unvaccinated and fulfilled the other criteria. Data were collected primarily by self-reported survey after both vaccine doses, with telephone follow-up for those reporting any medically attended event. Participants reported significant health events (new or worsening of a health event sufficient to cause work or school absenteeism, medical consultation, or prevent daily activities) occurring within 7 days of vaccination or within the past 7 days for unvaccinated individuals. We employed multivariable logistic regression to examine significant health events associated with mRNA vaccines, adjusting for age group, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and trimester, as appropriate. FINDINGS: As of Nov 4, 2021, 191 360 women aged 15-49 years with known pregnancy status had completed the first vaccine dose survey and 94 937 had completed the second dose survey. 180 388 received one dose and 94 262 received a second dose of an mRNA vaccine, with 5597 pregnant participants receiving dose one and 3108 receiving dose two, and 174 765 non-pregnant participants receiving dose one and 91 131 receiving dose two. Of 6179 included unvaccinated control participants, 339 were pregnant and 5840 were not pregnant. Overall, 226 (4·0%) of 5597 vaccinated pregnant females reported a significant health event after dose one of an mRNA vaccine, and 227 (7·3%) of 3108 after dose two, compared with 11 (3·2%) of 339 pregnant unvaccinated females. Pregnant vaccinated females had an increased odds of a significant health event within 7 days of the vaccine after dose two of mRNA-1273 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4·4 [95% CI 2·4-8·3]) compared with pregnant unvaccinated controls within the past 7 days, but not after dose one of mRNA-1273 or any dose of BNT162b2. Pregnant vaccinated females had decreased odds of a significant health event compared with non-pregnant vaccinated females after both dose one (aOR 0·63 [95% CI 0·55-0·72]) and dose two (aOR 0·62 [0·54-0·71]) of any mRNA vaccination. There were no significant differences in any analyses when restricted to events which led to medical attention. INTERPRETATION: COVID-19 mRNA vaccines have a good safety profile in pregnancy. These data can be used to appropriately inform pregnant people regarding reactogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy, and should be considered alongside effectiveness and immunogenicity data to make appropriate recommendations about best use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Public Health Agency of Canada.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios de Cohortes , Vacuna BNT162 , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Ontario
3.
Can Geriatr J ; 25(2): 183-196, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1893249

RESUMEN

Background: We report characteristics and outcomes of adults admitted to Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) Serious Outcomes Surveillance (SOS) Network hospitals with COVID-19 in 2020. Methods: Patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to 11 sites in Ontario, Quebec, Alberta, and Nova Scotia up to December 31, 2020 were enrolled in this prospective observational cohort study. Measures included age, sex, demographics, housing, exposures, Clinical Frailty Scale, comorbidities; in addition, length of stay, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, and survival were assessed. Descriptive analyses and multivariable logistic regressions were conducted. Results: Among 2,011 patients, mean age was 71.0 (range 19-105) years. 29.7% were admitted from assisted living or long-term care facilities. The full spectrum of frailty was represented in both younger and older age groups. 81.8% had at least one underlying comorbidity and 27.2% had obesity. Mortality was 14.3% without ICU admission, and 24.6% for those admitted to ICU. Older age and frailty were independent predictors of lower ICU use and higher mortality; accounting for frailty, obesity was not an independent predictor of mortality, and associations of comorbidities with mortality were weakened. Conclusions: Frailty is a critical clinical factor in predicting outcomes of COVID-19, which should be considered in research and clinical settings.

4.
BMJ Open ; 12(1): e051254, 2022 01 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1642869

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 vaccines require enhanced safety monitoring after emergency approval. The Canadian National Vaccine Safety Network monitors the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and provides enhanced monitoring for healthy, auto-immune, immunocompromised, pregnant and breastfeeding populations and allows for the detection of safety signals. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Online participant reporting of health events in vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals 12 years of age and older is captured in three surveys: 1 week after dose 1, 1 week after dose 2 and 7 months after dose 1. Medically attended events are followed up by telephone. The number, percentage, rate per 10 000 and incident rate ratios with 95% CIs are calculated by health event, vaccine type, sex and in 10-year age groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Each study site has Research Ethics Board approvals for the project (UBC Children's & Women's, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Health PEI, Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board, University of Calgary and Alberta Health Services, IWK Health, Unity Health Toronto and CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Ethics Boards). Individuals are invited to participate in this active surveillance and electronic consent is given before proceeding to each survey. Weekly reports are shared with public health and posted on the study website. At least one peer-reviewed manuscript is produced.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Alberta , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunación/efectos adversos
5.
Microb Cell ; 9(1): 1-20, 2022 Jan 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1622900

RESUMEN

The early diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections is required to identify and isolate contagious patients to prevent further transmission of SARS-CoV-2. In this study, we present a multitarget real-time TaqMan reverse transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) assay for the quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 and some of its circulating variants harboring mutations that give the virus a selective advantage. Seven different primer-probe sets that included probes containing locked nucleic acid (LNA) nucleotides were designed to amplify specific wild-type and mutant sequences in Orf1ab, Envelope (E), Spike (S), and Nucleocapsid (N) genes. Furthermore, a newly developed primer-probe set targeted human ß2-microglobulin (B2M) as a highly sensitive internal control for RT efficacy. All singleplex and fourplex assays detected ≤ 14 copies/reaction of quantified synthetic RNA transcripts, with a linear amplification range of nine logarithmic orders. Primer-probe sets for detection of SARS-CoV-2 exhibited no false-positive amplifications with other common respiratory pathogens, including human coronaviruses NL63, 229E, OC43, and HKU-1. Fourplex assays were evaluated using 160 clinical samples positive for SARS-CoV-2. Results showed that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA was detected in all samples, including viral strains harboring mutations in the Spike coding sequence that became dominant in the pandemic. Given the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants and their rapid spread in some populations, fourplex rRT-PCR assay containing four primer-probe sets represents a reliable approach to allow quicker detection of circulating relevant variants in a single reaction.

6.
Can Commun Dis Rep ; 47(10): 430-434, 2021 Oct 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1504549

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We carried out a case-control study that examined whether receipt of the inactivated influenza vaccine during the 2019-2020 season impacted on the risk of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), as there was a concern that the vaccine could be detrimental through viral interference. METHODS: A total of 920 cases with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection (diagnosed between March and October 2020) and 2,123 uninfected controls were recruited from those who were born in Québec between 1956 and 1976 and who had received diagnostic services at two hospitals (Montréal and Sherbrooke, Québec). After obtaining consent, a questionnaire was administered by phone. Data were analyzed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among healthcare workers, inactivated influenza vaccine received during the previous influenza season was not associated with increased COVID-19 risk (AOR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.69-1.41). Among participants who were not healthcare workers, influenza vaccination was associated with lower odds of COVID-19 (AOR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.96). CONCLUSION: We found no evidence that seasonal influenza vaccine increased the risk of developing COVID-19.

7.
Vaccine ; 39(50): 7300-7307, 2021 12 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1397725

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, before severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines became available, it was hypothesized that BCG (Bacillus Calmette-Guérin), which stimulates innate immunity, could provide protection against SARS-CoV-2. Numerous ecological studies, plagued by methodological deficiencies, revealed a country-level association between BCG use and lower COVID-19 incidence and mortality. We aimed to determine whether BCG administered in early life decreased the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in adulthood and the severity of COVID-19. METHODS: This case-control study was conducted in Quebec, Canada. Cases were patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test performed at two hospitals between March-October 2020. Controls were identified among patients with non-COVID-19 samples processed by the same microbiology laboratories during the same period. Enrolment was limited to individuals born in Quebec between 1956 and 1976, whose vaccine status was accessible in a computerized registry of 4.2 million BCG vaccinations. RESULTS: We recruited 920 cases and 2123 controls. Fifty-four percent of cases (n = 424) and 53% of controls (n = 1127) had received BCG during childhood (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.89-1.21), while 12% of cases (n = 114) and 11% of controls (n = 235) had received two or more BCG doses (OR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.88-1.46). After adjusting for age, sex, material deprivation, recruiting hospital and occupation there was no evidence of protection conferred by BCG against SARS-CoV-2 (AOR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.84-1.21). Among cases, 77 (8.4%) needed hospitalization and 18 (2.0%) died. The vaccinated were as likely as the unvaccinated to require hospitalization (AOR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.62-1.67) or to die (AOR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.32-2.39). CONCLUSIONS: BCG does not provide long-term protection against symptomatic COVID-19 or severe forms of the disease.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Vacuna BCG , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Quebec/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2
8.
CMAJ ; 192(46): E1487-E1492, 2020 11 16.
Artículo en Francés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1041398

RESUMEN

CONTEXTE: On a signalé l'anosmie et la dysgueusie comme symptômes potentiels de la maladie à coronavirus 2019. Cette étude visait à confirmer si ces symptômes sont caractéristiques chez les personnes ayant eu un résultat positif au dépistage du coronavirus du syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère 2 (SRAS-CoV-2). MÉTHODES: Nous avons réalisé une étude cas­témoins appariée selon l'âge dans la région des Cantons-de-l'Est, au Québec, entre le 10 et le 23 mars 2020. Nous avons inclus les adultes (18 ans et plus) ayant obtenu un résultat positif au dépistage du SRAS-CoV-2 par test d'amplification en chaîne par polymérase couplée à une transcription inverse. Les cas ont été appariés (1:1) par tranche d'âge de 5 ans avec des témoins sélectionnés aléatoirement parmi tous les patients ayant eu un résultat négatif au dépistage pendant la même période. Les données démographiques et de laboratoire ont été récupérées dans les dossiers médicaux. Les symptômes cliniques et les comorbidités associés à l'anosmie et à la dysgueusie ont été notés lors d'entrevues téléphoniques faites au moyen d'un questionnaire standardisé. RÉSULTATS: Parmi les 2883 personnes soumises au dépistage du SRAS-CoV-2, nous avons recensé 134 cas positifs (70 femmes [52,2 %] et 64 hommes [47,8 %]; âge médian 57,1 ans [intervalle interquartile 41,2­64,5 ans]). Les symptômes indépendamment associés à l'infection confirmée au SRAS-CoV-2 dans une analyse de régression logistique conditionnelle étaient les suivants : anosmie et/ou dysgueusie (rapport de cotes [RC] ajusté 62,9; intervalle de confiance [IC] de 95 % 11,0­359,7), myalgie (RC ajusté 7,6; IC de 95 % 1,9­29,9), vision trouble (RC ajusté 0,1; IC de 95 % 0,0­0,8) et douleur thoracique (RC ajusté 0,1; IC de 95 % 0,0­0,6). INTERPRÉTATION: Nous avons observé un lien étroit entre les symptômes olfactifs et gustatifs et la positivité au SRAS-CoV-2. Ces symptômes devraient être considérés comme une caractéristique fréquente et distinctive de l'infection au SRAS-CoV-2 et devraient servir d'indication de dépistage, et même de répétition du dépistage chez les personnes dont le résultat initial est négatif.

9.
CMAJ ; 192(26): E702-E707, 2020 06 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-423000

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anosmia and dysgeusia have been reported as potential symptoms of coronavirus disease 2019. This study aimed to confirm whether anosmia and dysgeusia are specific symptoms among those who tested positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). METHODS: We conducted an age-matched case-control study in the Eastern Townships region of Quebec between Mar. 10 and Mar. 23, 2020. We included adults (age ≥ 18 yr) who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Cases were matched (1:1) according to 5-year age groups with control patents selected randomly from among all patients who tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 during the same period. Demographic and laboratory information was collected from medical records. Clinical symptoms and comorbidities associated with anosmia and dysgeusia were obtained by telephone interview with a standardized questionnaire. RESULTS: Among 2883 people tested for SARS-CoV-2, we identified 134 positive cases (70 women [52.2%] and 64 men [47.8%]; median age 57.1 [interquartile range 41.2-64.5] yr). The symptoms independently associated with SARS-CoV-2 positivity in conditional logistic regression were anosmia or dysgeusia or both (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 62.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 11.0-359.7), presence of myalgia (adjusted OR 7.6, 95% CI 1.9-29.9), blurred vision (adjusted OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.0-0.8) and chest pain (adjusted OR 0.1, 95% CI 0.0-0.6). INTERPRETATION: We found a strong association between olfactory and gustatory symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 positivity. These symptoms should be considered as common and distinctive features of SARS-CoV-2 infection and should serve as an indication for testing and possible retesting of people whose first test result is negative.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Disgeusia/etiología , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Quebec , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA